California Verdicts

Find out about the most important recent California cases, selected by VerdictSearch editors. Coverage includes Alameda, Los Angeles, Orange, San Francisco and San Diego counties. Subscribe to VerdictSearch for access to all California verdictsPricing Options

‘Profemur R’ hip implant was defective, patient alleged

Amount:

$4,500,000

Type:

Verdict-Plaintiff

State:

California

Venue:

Los Angeles County

Court:

Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Van Nuys

Injury Type(s):

hip; hip-hip replacement; leg-fracture (fracture, femur);
other-prosthesis; pelvis

Case Type:

Products Liability – Design Defect, Failure to Warn; Medical Malpractice – Informed Consent; Products Liability – Breach of Warranty, Manufacturing Defect

Case Name:

Alan Warner and Patricia Warner v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Wright Medical Group, Inc., Brad L. Penenberg M.D. and Harlan C. Amstutz M.D.,
No. BC475958

Date:

June 12, 2015

Parties

Plaintiff(s):

Alan Warner (Male), 

Patricia Warner (Female)

Plaintiff Attorney(s):

Steven R. Vartazarian;
The Vartazarian Law Firm, APC;
Los Angeles,
CA,
for
Alan Warner, Patricia Warner ■ George E. McLaughlin;
Warshauer-McLaughlin Law Group, P.C.;
Denver,
CO,
for
Alan Warner, Patricia Warner

Plaintiff Expert(s):

Mari Truman; P.E.; Biomechanics; Dublin,
OH called by:
Steven R. Vartazarian, George E. McLaughlin ■ Reed Ayers; Ph.D.; Materials Science; Denver,
CO called by:
Steven R. Vartazarian, George E. McLaughlin ■ Myron Stachniw; M.D.; Orthopedic Surgery; Galesburg,
IL called by:
Steven R. Vartazarian, George E. McLaughlin

Defendant(s):

Brad L. Penenberg M.D., 

Harlan C. Amstutz M.D., 

Wright Medical Group Inc., 

Wright Medical Technology Inc.

Defense Attorney(s):

David C. Van Dyke;
Howard & Howard;
Chicago,
IL,
for
Wright Medical Group Inc., Wright Medical Technology Inc. ■ Michael O. Fawaz;
Howard & Howard;
Royal Oak,
MI,
for
Wright Medical Group Inc., Wright Medical Technology Inc. ■ Michael V. Kell;
Howard & Howard;
Royal Oak,
MI,
for
Wright Medical Group Inc., Wright Medical Technology Inc. ■ Michael L. Kirby;
Kirby Noonan Lance & Hoge LLP;
San Diego,
CA,
for
Wright Medical Group Inc., Wright Medical Technology Inc. ■ None reported;

Chicago,
IL,
for
Brad L. Penenberg M.D., Harlan C. Amstutz M.D. ■ Micaela Banach;
Kirby Noonan Lance & Hoge LLP;
San Diego,
CA,
for
Wright Medical Group Inc., Wright Medical Technology Inc.

Defendant Expert(s):

Brad James;
Metallurgy;
Menlo Park,
CA called by:
David C. Van Dyke, Michael O. Fawaz, Michael V. Kell, Michael L. Kirby, Micaela Banach ■ Irina Timmerman;
Medical Research;
Memphis,
TN called by:
David C. Van Dyke, Michael O. Fawaz, Michael V. Kell, Michael L. Kirby, Micaela Banach ■ Jorge Ochoa;
Biomechanical;
Bellevue,
WA called by:
David C. Van Dyke, Michael O. Fawaz, Michael V. Kell, Michael L. Kirby, Micaela Banach ■ Robert Windsor;
Physical Medicine;
Marietta,
GA called by:
David C. Van Dyke, Michael O. Fawaz, Michael V. Kell, Michael L. Kirby, Micaela Banach

Facts:

On Nov. 27, 2007, plaintiff Alan Warner, 63, had a "Profemur R" prosthesis implanted to replace his artificial hip. Three years later, on Oct. 27, 2010, he was walking in his home when he suddenly felt severe pain in and around his left groin. He was unable to walk and immediately lay down. The following morning, he presented to Cedars Sinai Medical Center and was diagnosed with a left femoral stem fracture. At the hospital it was determined that the Profemur R implant had snapped at the stem. The Profemur R femoral component (serial no. 037409895) was manufactured by Wright Medical Technology Inc. A few days later, on Nov. 1, 2010, Warner underwent revision surgery performed by Brad Penenberg, M.D., whereby the entire left-hip implant system was revised again. On Feb. 1, 2011, the revised hip-implant system failed, when the acetabular component did not take to Warner’s pelvis, causing an anterior dislocation and resulting in subsidence of the femoral component. On the same day, Warner presented to the Cedars Sinai Medical Center emergency department, where he was admitted. The following day, he underwent a closed reduction of the hip under general anesthesia. The physicians believed that his hip was still unstable. On Feb. 7, 2011, Warner again underwent a revision of his total hip implant system, but from a different manufacturer. Warner sued Wright Medical Technology Inc., Wright Medical Group Inc., Brad L. Penenberg, M.D. and Harlan C. Amstutz, M.D. (Only Wright Medical Technology continued as a defendant to trial, as all other defendants were either dropped or removed from the case.) He alleged products liability claims of manufacturing and design defects and failure to warn. Warner contended the implant broke at a laser orientation mark which physicians use to orient the device during surgery. He alleged the laser mark was burned too deeply into the device, which resulted in the titanium alloy which the device was made of to melt and re-solidify as Aluminum Oxide, making it brittle and more prone to corrosion. Warner also argued that as a result, the device’s microstructure was altered and the device could no longer withstand stresses and loads it was designed to during normal patient use. Specifically, plaintiff maintained that laser engravings deeper than 35 microns can cause the titanium in metal implants to become brittle, and that the crack in Warner’s Profemur R emanated from a laser mark more than 100 microns deep. The defense asserted that the break resulted not through a defect in the implant, but because the top of the implant was not properly affixed to Warner’s existing bone. The defense contended that Penenberg could have selected a larger-sized implant system, which would have been a better fit for Warner. Warner claimed that Penenberg was sought by Wright to use its implants and to train other surgeons and that he no longer uses the implant since he learned of Warner’s fracture. The defense asserted this was a one-off case involving part-components with a strong track record of clinical success. The system is unrelated to ongoing consolidated litigation involving metal-on-metal hip-prosthesis cases.

Injury:

Following the fracture, Warner experienced a number of dislocations and prolonged infections, which required 14 major surgeries. Alan Warner’s wife, Patricia Warner, sought recovery for her claim of loss of consortium.

Result:

The jury found that the design of the Profemur R device was not defective, but that it was defectively manufactured. The jury found the defect was a substantial factor in causing Warner harm. The jury awarded Alan Warner $4 million for past and future pain and suffering, and $500,000 to Patricia Warner for loss of consortium.

Trial Information:

Judge:

Michael Harwin

Trial Length:

15
 days

Trial Deliberations:

2
 days

Editor’s Comment:

This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs’ counsel and defense counsel for Wright Medical and includes information gleaned from court documents. Counsel for other defendants were not asked to contribute.